Strategic planning for businesses, Part II

By Hal Snow

Last month, in the first half of this two-part series on strategic planning, we reviewed the important fact that the growth, processing, distribution, retail sale and use of marijuana, while legal under state law, remains illegal as a controlled substance under federal law. The Aug. 29, 2013 Cole memo is guidance from the federal government which provides that the federal government will not enforce the marijuana laws in Washington so long as the state does an adequate job of preventing the marijuana industry from being abused in the state of Washington. 

The Cole memo is guidance which could be amended or withdrawn at any time either in whole or part. The impact would lead to criminal prosecution and severe economic hardship.

So what do we recommend for the I-502 business participant?

As mentioned at the end of the last month’s article, we recommend that the I-502 business person utilize a strategic asset ownership plan of limited liability companies (LLCs) and trusts to isolate the risk inherent with the I-502 business from the other assets of the business participant.


Structuring with LLCs: The I-502 business should be owned by an LLC (Washington state law appears to require that the business be owned by an LLC formed under Washington law. See WAC 314.55.020(7)). If the I-502 business person has several I-502 related businesses each business should be operated within its own LLC. The reason for this is to isolate the liabilities associated with each I-502 business within its own separate LLC. We further recommend that the I-502 business person have a second LLC hold the ownership in the I-502 business entity (the operating entity).

The ownership LLC provides a second layer of protection by having both the ownership and operation of the I-502 business in LLCs.

Under Washington law, assuming the investors of the LLC properly operate the LLC and treat it as a separate, independent legal entity, the liabilities associated with the operation of the I-502 business should remain within the LLC and not “bleed” over into the other assets of the I-502 business person. (In the event the federal government reversed the prosecuting of violators of the Controlled Substance Act as it relates to Washington residents, there is no assurance this structure would protect the I-502 business person from criminal liability if found personally liable for violating the federal Controlled Substance Act.)


The use of trusts: A portion of the more important “other” assets of the I-502 business person should be also owned in the LLC, which are in fact owned by an irrevocable trust founded under the laws of Delaware, Alaska, Nevada or one of the other 13 states which permit grantors (such as the I-502 business person) to create an irrevocable trust, transfer assets into the trust, retain an interest as a discretionary beneficiary of the trust, and have the assets so transferred into the trust not be subject to the claims of the grantor’s creditors (I-502 related or otherwise).

Assuming the transfer of the assets into the trust was not a fraudulent transfer, the assets within the trust should be protected from the claims of the granting creditors. Washington trust law provides no similar protection for grantors.

To summarize, the trust is irrevocable. The trust and distribution from the trust are managed by the trustee. The guarantor may not be the trustee. The beneficiaries of the trust include the grantor, the spouse of the grantor and the children of the grantor. Distributions from the trust are discretionary.

Assuming a married grantor, with a stable marriage, variation on this theme would be to have the grantor establish the trust and have his or her spouse and the children be the beneficiaries to the trust.


Conclusion: Property structured and maintained, and assuming the transfer of the assets into the trust is not a fraudulent transfer, the assets should be protected from the claims of creditors relating to both the I-502 business and other businesses including confiscation in the event the Cole memo is revoked, the protocol deemed breached or compliance with the federal Controlled Substance Act deemed violated.

Attorney Hal Snow, of Garvey Schubert Barer Law, has 30 years of experience counseling business owners in the areas of asset protection planning, wealth transfer and tax minimization.




Comments are closed.

Latest News



8 hours


Living the Dream: Shawn DeNae

1 day


Vertically Challenged

2 days

Sponsored News, Products, Profiles

Turnkey Efficiency

3 days

Product Spotlight


3 days


How the Cannabis Industry Can Be a Leader

As many have come to realize, cannabis is one of…

Read More >

Hiring Practices

Retained executive search has been the focus of my career…

Read More >


There have been times that Shanel Lindsay has been “green…

Read More >
Website Design